Click on our Secret Library of Evidence ------>

    BANKILEAKS Secret Library

Loan Application Forms (LAF's)  

    Bank Emails to Brokers  

    Then Click on 'VIEW NOTEBOOK'

Join us on facebook

facebook3           facebook2 


What BFCSA Does...

BFCSA investigates fraud involving lenders, spruikers and financial planners worldwide.  Full Doc, Low Doc, No Doc loans, Lines of Credit and Buffer loans appear to be normal profit making financial products, however, these loans are set to implode within seven years.  For the past two decades, Ms Brailey, President of BFCSA (Inc), has been a tireless campaigner, championing the cause of older and low income people around the Globe who have fallen victim to banking and finance scams.  She has found that people of all ages are being targeted by Bankers offering faulty lending products. BFCSA warn that anyone who has signed up for one of these financial products, is in grave danger of losing their home.


Articles View Hits

Whistleblowers' Corner!

To all mortgage brokers, BDMs and loan approval officers! 
Pls Call Denise: 0401 642 344 

"Confidentiality is assured."

Cartoon Corner

Lighten your load today and "Laugh all the way to the bank!"

Lee Doyle

Led by award-winning consumer advocate Denise Brailey, BFCSA (Inc) are a group of people who are concerned about the appalling growth of Loan Fraud around the world. BFCSA (Inc) is a not for profit organisation in the spirit of global community concern and justice.

Click on the Cluster Map.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Login
    Login Login form

Westpac incorrectly classified $28.8 billion in property loans for up to three years, APRA infuriated

Posted by on in Bankers A Law Unto Themselves
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 1826
  • Print

 Westpac has infuriated the peak banking regulator APRA and the opposition has called for an explanation after the bank revealed that it had incorrectly classified $28.8 billion in property loans for up to three years.

(The) bank had been recording the loans as belonging to owner-occupiers since November 2008, when in fact they had been used for investment purposes.

The error went unnoticed during the GFC, but was discovered during an internal review and brought to the attention of the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority. “When we told them about the way we found out I don’t think they were happy about it,” a Westpac spokesman said.

 I’m sure they weren’t happy, but the issue is – why was this only “discovered” during an internal review and not by APRA itself investigating one of the biggest bank mergers (Westpac/St George) in Australian corporate history?

 Westpac has publicly called these revisions as “legacy” issues with the merger, with changes relating to when a borrower reduced the LVR (loan value ratio) on their home, but then used that “Equity mate!” to buy an investment property (usually as the deposit for the subsequent investment property loan).

 Considering the trillion dollar plus nature of the mortgage market, that this significant revision is not required to be disclosed in the banks corporate reports is staggering.

 Therefore the corporate regulator ASIC would not be aware of such revisions (and neither would investors, shareholders or analysts investigating the robustness of the mortgage side of the business) and it appears APRA does not become aware until the banks tell them… Seems to be more Holes than Houses going on here.

 Here’s the full list of revisions:

Asset RevaluationRevisionChange
Loans to households: Owner Occ. From $198.6 billion to $165.2 billion Down 17%
Loans to households: Investment From $88.6 billion to $116.2 billion Up 32%
Loans to financial corporations From $10.1 billion to $11.3 billion Up 11%
Investment securities From $70.1 billion to $90.2 billion Up 28%
Trading securities From $51.1 billion to $32.3 billion Down 37%

Interestingly, in their press release, Westpac confirmed that their housing valuation methodology, and by extension their systemic risk management, has nothing to do with the investment fundamentals behind the asset, but rather depends on how the purchase is financed:

“But the risk really relates to the individual, not the property.
The real risk in the mortgage is whether people can continue to pay or not. We lend based on people’s capacity to repay.

Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:


  • doyla66
    doyla66 Tuesday, 20 November 2012

    Will they get fined? or a slap on the wrist.

  • doyla66
    doyla66 Tuesday, 20 November 2012

    Re: Bank$ster furnished APRA 'status' statistics ~ '"Mary Poppins Show"

    Lee, simply shaken-not-stirred+olive; +most LowDocs 'irregular' thru contrived "Invest" -v- "personal", b/officer 'white-outed'[MY]'faxed' LAF--morphed to "Invest-Purposes", the quantum of critical 'data' corrupted is massive...certainly, none can be relied upon as truly representative to properly determine "weighted-asset" ratios under pending Basel III criteria...purported loan-status "statistics" can only ever be entertained as a "Mary Poppins" show at best.

  • doyla66
    doyla66 Wednesday, 21 November 2012

    Regulators asleep at the wheel . . . . . .still?

    So, APRA is 'infuriated'. Big deal. What we want to know is why they always wait until they 'get told about' it?
    Every heard of being proactive APRA? Obviously not. But what they do know, is how to be experts in being reactive.

  • doyla66
    doyla66 Wednesday, 21 November 2012


    Asleep at the wheel alright,APRA,ASIC,FED Police, Gov agencies,Politicians. We can give you more evidence on a plate - how much easier does it get. They would be on a winner!

Leave your comment

Guest Friday, 14 August 2020