GLOBAL SUB-PRIME CRISIS

BANKILEAKS

Click on our Secret Library of Evidence ------>

    BANKILEAKS Secret Library

Loan Application Forms (LAF's)  

    Bank Emails to Brokers  

    Then Click on 'VIEW NOTEBOOK'

Join us on facebook
 

facebook3           facebook2 

BFCSA
MORTGAGE
DISTRESS SOS

What BFCSA Does...

BFCSA investigates fraud involving lenders, spruikers and financial planners worldwide.  Full Doc, Low Doc, No Doc loans, Lines of Credit and Buffer loans appear to be normal profit making financial products, however, these loans are set to implode within seven years.  For the past two decades, Ms Brailey, President of BFCSA (Inc), has been a tireless campaigner, championing the cause of older and low income people around the Globe who have fallen victim to banking and finance scams.  She has found that people of all ages are being targeted by Bankers offering faulty lending products. BFCSA warn that anyone who has signed up for one of these financial products, is in grave danger of losing their home.

Visitors

Articles View Hits
728093

Whistleblowers' Corner!

To all mortgage brokers, BDMs and loan approval officers! 
Pls Call Denise: 0401 642 344 

"Confidentiality is assured."

Cartoon Corner

Lighten your load today and "Laugh all the way to the bank!"

Lee Doyle

Led by award-winning consumer advocate Denise Brailey, BFCSA (Inc) are a group of people who are concerned about the appalling growth of Loan Fraud around the world. BFCSA (Inc) is a not for profit organisation in the spirit of global community concern and justice.

Click on the Cluster Map.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Login
    Login Login form

FOS Transfer Tax Credits to Banks in lieu of ATO

Posted by on in Reserve Bank of Australia
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 2346
  • 5 Comments
  • Print

In the FOS process of compensation, it appears FOS credit the bank with any (if any) of the borrower's "negative geared" previously enjoyed tax benefits during the time of the problem loan period ("the period").

The FOS position pertaining to ATO 'offsets' ('credits') clearly purports to apply ATO offset benefits to the banks to determine the borrowers overall appropriate "compensation package".The FOS asserts that the banks are entitled to quote; "rent received from leasing the property and any tax deduction received for an investment property"

It appears, that the banks have enjoyed an FOS directed "unjust enrichment" in the form of an inappropriate tax offset benefit to their overall incumbent liability to the borrower by disgorging &/or transferring any of the borrower's tax offset benefits obtained during the period by way of the borrower  "negative gearing" the problem property.
 
Simply put, it's incumbent upon the applicant upon receipt of any bank interest (etc) "reimbursement" (vis a vis tax neutral refunds) to then make an appropriate ATO "tax adjustment" thru the independent advice of their accountant. By handing back retrospectively and/or to adjust any prior enjoyed tax offset benefit relating to the respective tax file years, as that tax 'offset' benefit is no longer applicable in the event interest in it's entirety is refunded to the borrower by the bank; the same bank interest that ultimately generated the original ATO "tax offset" in the first place.
 
The FOS is ostensibly NOT putting the  ATO back into a position AS IF THE CREDIT HAD NEVER BEEN GRANTED, but alternatively it appears that the FOS is electing to UNJUSTLY ENRICH THE BANK to the detriment of the Australian taxpayer by way of the ATO.
 
You're aware of the Senators displeasure referring to BANKWEST misappropriating the Gov. GST portion of liquidated "new unit &/or house" settlement funds where $millions were being misdirected (unlawfully) to the banks coffers, which such practice is apparently prevalent throughout banking industry, however this issue has only recently surfaced before the Senate Enquiry into Post GFC Banking Industry.
 
It also appears that the FOS are directing any prior "tax advantage" hitherto enjoyed by the FOS Applicant to the bank, in lieu of advising the FOS Applicant to make appropriate "personal ATO tax adjustments"; regardless, the bank and/or the FOS have no business improperly interfering by effectively "re-distributing" ATO tax credit benefits amongst the 36+ banks, tax credit benefits that ought to have been adjusted in favour of the ATO, save general appropriate comment to the borrower.
 
Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:

Comments

  • doyla66
    doyla66 Thursday, 30 August 2012

    Send that to the senators

  • doyla66
    doyla66 Thursday, 30 August 2012

    you used to be able to have your client get his accountant to obtain a form 221D and that meant the client would get his tax relief in his wage packet each week and NOW, instead of waiting till the end of the financial year for his rebate.

  • doyla66
    doyla66 Thursday, 30 August 2012

    So many twists and turns,how on earth do you all keep track of what goes on,it's beyond me.
    This whole debacle has been a real eye opener.It's opened a pandora's box full of lies,deceit and cheating.
    I am just so glad that we have some sane,honest and truly good hearted people in this world.
    These corporations ought to be paying hefty penalties and be punished it is just so WRONG!!!!!!!
    SUPADAVE your leading the way,be brave hold your head high you have done absolutely nothing illegal and should be left in peace,my thoughts and prayers are with you and your family,Good Luck.

  • doyla66
    doyla66 Thursday, 30 August 2012

    Overdue being sent to Senate

    Andy,
    I second Blackedout's comment...Your post is overdue being sent to the Senate. Some on the Senate panel need all the ammo to succeed with the drive for a Royal Commission. Great post by the way.

  • doyla66
    doyla66 Friday, 31 August 2012

    I "third" it, Andy!
    Sounds highly dodgy! Why give the banks the money which should be attended to in a Tax Adjustment and possibly impacts on BAS adjustments as well?
    Are the banks doubling as tax agents as well?

Leave your comment

Guest Friday, 14 August 2020