Click on our Secret Library of Evidence ------>

    BANKILEAKS Secret Library

Loan Application Forms (LAF's)  

    Bank Emails to Brokers  

    Then Click on 'VIEW NOTEBOOK'

Join us on facebook

facebook3           facebook2 


What BFCSA Does...

BFCSA investigates fraud involving lenders, spruikers and financial planners worldwide.  Full Doc, Low Doc, No Doc loans, Lines of Credit and Buffer loans appear to be normal profit making financial products, however, these loans are set to implode within seven years.  For the past two decades, Ms Brailey, President of BFCSA (Inc), has been a tireless campaigner, championing the cause of older and low income people around the Globe who have fallen victim to banking and finance scams.  She has found that people of all ages are being targeted by Bankers offering faulty lending products. BFCSA warn that anyone who has signed up for one of these financial products, is in grave danger of losing their home.


Articles View Hits

Whistleblowers' Corner!

To all mortgage brokers, BDMs and loan approval officers! 
Pls Call Denise: 0401 642 344 

"Confidentiality is assured."

Cartoon Corner

Lighten your load today and "Laugh all the way to the bank!"

Lee Doyle

Led by award-winning consumer advocate Denise Brailey, BFCSA (Inc) are a group of people who are concerned about the appalling growth of Loan Fraud around the world. BFCSA (Inc) is a not for profit organisation in the spirit of global community concern and justice.

Click on the Cluster Map.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Login
    Login Login form

APRA told Banks Executive remuneration must be aligned to quality

Posted by on in Corrupt Regulators
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 1811
  • Print

24 September, 2012

The Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) has warned financial services companies that the incentives they pay their executives have to be aligned with the quality within the products they sell. APRA general manager David Lewis last week drove home the point to a Financial Institutions Remuneration Group annual conference while at the same time saying that the regulator did not have a problem with how much bank executives were being paid, but "why" they were receiving those amounts. "In the financial sector, as in many other industries, performance-linked remuneration is the norm. And that's fine," he said. "APRA has no problem with performance-linked remuneration. (Indeed, while APRA may be a public sector agency, we too employ performance-based pay structures.) Sometimes these arrangements can be quite complex and incorporate a range of quantitative and qualitative performance measures. But at their heart, these sorts of incentive arrangements boil down to a simple proposition: 'Sell a widget; get a dollar'. "Now that's a pretty straightforward proposition if the 'widget' you're selling is a car or a refrigerator, where the return is earned at point of sale. But what if the 'widget' you are selling is a financial product where the pay-off is not so immediate? And what if that 'widget' turns out to be defective? Have you really sold a 'widget' at all?" Lewis said. He said financial institutions were clearly at risk if their performance incentives rewarded underwriting without also ensuring that the payment of those incentives was aligned to the quality of the business being written. "Despite all the public angst about the size of bank executive pay packets, we're ambivalent about that. What APRA looks at is not the 'how much' of executive pay, but the 'why'," Lewis said. "Our concern is to make sure that the remuneration practices adopted by regulated financial institutions are sound and do not imbed 'risk time bombs' on the balance sheet which could undermine the viability of the firm in the future. "What we look at are the performance hurdles that underpin these pay structures. Are these performance hurdles consistent with the prudent risk management of the firm? Or do the performance indicators used to reward executives promote short-term profits at the expense of the firm's long term sustainability?" he said.

Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:


  • doyla66
    doyla66 Monday, 24 September 2012

    Got to give Kudo's when it is warranted. Admire APRA for their sensibility and logic in this area.

  • doyla66
    doyla66 Monday, 24 September 2012

    At least APRA are thinking about the incentives that have fed bank culture and still drive bank behaviour. Rewarding short term gain resulting in long term pain is irresponsible and not consistent with "prudent banker" conduct. It also sends a bad message to all watching them get away with misconduct.

  • doyla66
    doyla66 Monday, 24 September 2012

    APRA, David Lewis, whoever. It has taken them a super long time to wake up to this issue. Many have spoken about performance salaries and bonuses for years. However, it doesn't matter how the banks perform, their top dogs get sickening amounts of bonuses.

  • doyla66
    doyla66 Monday, 24 September 2012

    Not to mention the junkets (eg ANZ's). Is APRA doing anything about looking into those? Or should it be ASIC or maybe ACCC?

  • doyla66
    doyla66 Monday, 24 September 2012

    Interfering in bank junkets would be seen as overstepping the boundaries that separate government from business. No doubt the banks see junkets as an internal decision to reward and motivate their staff.
    The timing of this announcement by APRA could also be another deliberate distraction to allay public concern over regulatory weakness.

Leave your comment

Guest Saturday, 15 August 2020