Click on our Secret Library of Evidence ------>

    BANKILEAKS Secret Library

Loan Application Forms (LAF's)  

    Bank Emails to Brokers  

    Then Click on 'VIEW NOTEBOOK'

Join us on facebook

facebook3           facebook2 


What BFCSA Does...

BFCSA investigates fraud involving lenders, spruikers and financial planners worldwide.  Full Doc, Low Doc, No Doc loans, Lines of Credit and Buffer loans appear to be normal profit making financial products, however, these loans are set to implode within seven years.  For the past two decades, Ms Brailey, President of BFCSA (Inc), has been a tireless campaigner, championing the cause of older and low income people around the Globe who have fallen victim to banking and finance scams.  She has found that people of all ages are being targeted by Bankers offering faulty lending products. BFCSA warn that anyone who has signed up for one of these financial products, is in grave danger of losing their home.


Articles View Hits

Whistleblowers' Corner!

To all mortgage brokers, BDMs and loan approval officers! 
Pls Call Denise: 0401 642 344 

"Confidentiality is assured."

Cartoon Corner

Lighten your load today and "Laugh all the way to the bank!"

Denise Brailey

Led by award-winning consumer advocate Denise Brailey, BFCSA (Inc) are a group of people who are concerned about the appalling growth of Loan Fraud around the world. BFCSA (Inc) is a not for profit organisation in the spirit of global community concern and justice.

Click on the Cluster Map.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Login
    Login Login form

BFCSA: Why COSL is no help to Consumers of Predatory Lending Products

Posted by on in BANKSTERS
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 2135
  • Print

We copied this from COSL Case History File on PREDATORY LENDING.  The case highlights why asking for a mortgage from a NON BANK LENDER is deadly high risk territory........................

This is the problem with COSL: 

Facts of the case

The complainants responded to an advertisement by the financial services provider, a broker, who professed to specialise in bad credit loans. They were looking to refinance their existing home loan and borrow a little extra to convert their garage into another bedroom.

Their existing loan was in arrears and they were about to lose their home. The complainants were both unemployed and on Centrelink payments, with four children and another on the way. The Broker was aware of this.


Nonetheless, the Broker arranged two new loans for them one for $110,000 at 8.95% (plus 3% on default) and the other for $72,317 at 23.60%. The loan was repayable in twelve months and was substantially more than the amount the complainants initially sought. As it turned out, most of the increase was attributable to inflated broker commissions and legal costs.

The complainants signed the loan agreement on the broker's assurance that they would be able to refinance the loan at the end of the term with a loan that had lower repayments, fees and charges.

The Broker sought and received a statement from the complainants to the effect that Affordability won’t be problem. We also confirm that it is still only a 12 month loan. All fees and charges have been disclosed to (us). This was dictated to them. On settlement of the loans, the financial services provider helped himself to $13,225 in brokerage fees and $1,200 in consultant’s fees.

The complainants defaulted on their very first repayment, as the new repayments were twice the amount of their previous repayments. The Lender predictably sought possession.

Financial Service Provider's Position

Despite our every effort to conciliate, attempts at resolution failed due to the broker's inflexibility. The Broker was adamant that he was not at fault. The matter was eventually referred to the Credit Ombudsman for a Determination.

Our Position

The Credit Ombudsman considered that the Business Purpose Declaration was ineffective under the Credit Code, given that the broker knew or had reason to believe that the purpose of the loan was not for business, but to refinance a home loan. Furthermore, the lack of a Finance Brokers Agreement entitled the complainants to recover the commission they paid to the Broker.

The Credit Ombudsman found against the broker (the Lender was not a COSL scheme participant) under several heads of law and awarded the complainants compensation in an amount equivalent to the broker's commission, the Lenders legal fees (so far that it exceeded what was reasonable) and other disbursements associated with setting up the loan.  

The Ombudsman also found that the financial services provider had acted unconscionably as he would have been aware that the complainants:

·         were not sophisticated in financial affairs

·         had defaulted on their previous loan

·         were anxious, if not desperate, to avoid losing their home

·         were unemployed and in receipt of Centrelink payments.

The Resolution

The Ombudsman determined that the broker took unconscientious advantage of his position as their agent by arranging a loan for the Complainants: 

·         that required repayments of more than double those of their existing loan;

·         that was significantly larger than their previous loan, primarily because of the excessive broker commissions and lender fees charged;

·         that significantly reduced the equity in the value of their home from 32% to 15%; and


·         that was secured over their only asset, their home.


Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:


  • doyla66
    doyla66 Sunday, 28 July 2013

    Lender not a member of COSL or FOS?
    Wonder if they had a credit provision licence? Or an AFSL?
    It should be commonsense - if borrower can't afford their existing loan how can they afford a larger loan repayment?
    But if a broker need to make a home loan "sale" and a lender doesn't care or check ...
    Did the borrowers keep their home?
    The borrowers were awarded compensation equivalent to the broker's commission (plus legal and set up fees) - why broker's commission as a figure? ...that sounds odd.

  • doyla66
    doyla66 Monday, 29 July 2013

    Consumers are seen as white shark bait-- and where is the lender, conveniently unseen, never properly pursued as usual......

Leave your comment

Guest Friday, 14 August 2020