Click on our Secret Library of Evidence ------>

    BANKILEAKS Secret Library

Loan Application Forms (LAF's)  

    Bank Emails to Brokers  

    Then Click on 'VIEW NOTEBOOK'

Join us on facebook

facebook3           facebook2 


What BFCSA Does...

BFCSA investigates fraud involving lenders, spruikers and financial planners worldwide.  Full Doc, Low Doc, No Doc loans, Lines of Credit and Buffer loans appear to be normal profit making financial products, however, these loans are set to implode within seven years.  For the past two decades, Ms Brailey, President of BFCSA (Inc), has been a tireless campaigner, championing the cause of older and low income people around the Globe who have fallen victim to banking and finance scams.  She has found that people of all ages are being targeted by Bankers offering faulty lending products. BFCSA warn that anyone who has signed up for one of these financial products, is in grave danger of losing their home.


Articles View Hits

Whistleblowers' Corner!

To all mortgage brokers, BDMs and loan approval officers! 
Pls Call Denise: 0401 642 344 

"Confidentiality is assured."

Cartoon Corner

Lighten your load today and "Laugh all the way to the bank!"

Denise Brailey

Led by award-winning consumer advocate Denise Brailey, BFCSA (Inc) are a group of people who are concerned about the appalling growth of Loan Fraud around the world. BFCSA (Inc) is a not for profit organisation in the spirit of global community concern and justice.

Click on the Cluster Map.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Login
    Login Login form

BFCSA: UK Banks avoid break-up as CMA calls for disclosure

Posted by on in BANKSTERS
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 1118
  • Print

Never any good news about banks as usual...


Banks avoid break-up as CMA calls for disclosure

Competition and Markets Authority disappoints consumer groups after its banking inquiry backs off from radical remedies to improve service

17 May 2016

Consumer groups have branded a 19-month inquiry into retail banking a disappointment after the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) proposed a cap on unauthorised overdraft fees and a requirement for banks to join a price-comparison website.

Ignoring calls for a break-up of the big banks, the CMA said the problem with the banking market was the inability of consumers to get information on costs and charges.  It believes providing people with the right information will help them tell if their bank is offering value for money and could prompt more to switch provider.

Currently nearly 60% of banks’ personal customers have stayed with the same bank for over ten years and over 90% of small businesses get loans from the bank where they have their current account, proof of a lack of competition in the sector.

The CMA wants banks to set a monthly maximum on the amount they charge on unauthorised overdrafts and to alert customers when they are breaching their limits. In 2014 banks generated £1.2 billion of revenues unarranged overdraft charges.  It has also proposed new online comparison tools and improvements to the current account switching service.

It urged banks to speed up their adoption of new technology and introduce an open API (application programming interface) banking standard. This would enable customers to safely share their transaction histories and could enable the development of apps that could direct people to banks that offered them the best deal, the CMI said.

‘For too long banks have been able to sit back and not work hard enough for their personal and small business customers,’ Alasdair Smith, chair of the Retail Banking Investigation, said in the report.

However, his team has dismissed the idea of breaking up the existing high street banks.  ‘Having more and smaller banks, which customers still couldn’t easily choose between because of lack of transparency on fees and charges, would not significantly improve the market or give customers a better deal,’ the CMA said.

The watchdog considered abolishing the traditional banking model of ‘free if in credit’ (FIIC) current accounts. Although it said such accounts were not really ‘free’ it said they worked well for many customers and banning them would reduce choice and could see the cost of current accounts rise, not fall.

Which?, the consumer rights campaign group, expressed disappointment at the findings.  ‘This inquiry has achieved little more than to propose basic information measures the big banks should have introduced years ago,’ said Alex Neill, director of policy and campaigns.

‘Steps to stimulate switching are welcome but the chance to deliver better banking for all customers has been missed,’ he added.  He called for the City regulator, the Financial Conduct Authority, to step in and tackle unfair overdraft charges that in some cases are far higher than notorious payday loans.


In the City, bank shares rose as investors and analysts reckoned the Big Four banks had got off lightly

Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:


  • No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave your comment

Guest Thursday, 02 April 2020