Click on our Secret Library of Evidence ------>

    BANKILEAKS Secret Library

Loan Application Forms (LAF's)  

    Bank Emails to Brokers  

    Then Click on 'VIEW NOTEBOOK'

Join us on facebook

facebook3           facebook2 


What BFCSA Does...

BFCSA investigates fraud involving lenders, spruikers and financial planners worldwide.  Full Doc, Low Doc, No Doc loans, Lines of Credit and Buffer loans appear to be normal profit making financial products, however, these loans are set to implode within seven years.  For the past two decades, Ms Brailey, President of BFCSA (Inc), has been a tireless campaigner, championing the cause of older and low income people around the Globe who have fallen victim to banking and finance scams.  She has found that people of all ages are being targeted by Bankers offering faulty lending products. BFCSA warn that anyone who has signed up for one of these financial products, is in grave danger of losing their home.


Articles View Hits

Whistleblowers' Corner!

To all mortgage brokers, BDMs and loan approval officers! 
Pls Call Denise: 0401 642 344 

"Confidentiality is assured."

Cartoon Corner

Lighten your load today and "Laugh all the way to the bank!"

Denise Brailey

Led by award-winning consumer advocate Denise Brailey, BFCSA (Inc) are a group of people who are concerned about the appalling growth of Loan Fraud around the world. BFCSA (Inc) is a not for profit organisation in the spirit of global community concern and justice.

Click on the Cluster Map.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Login
    Login Login form

BFCSA: Tricky Cormann and Hockey caused a win for Consumers of Banking Products by trying to weaken FoFA says Crikey

Posted by on in From My Window
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 1398
  • Print

Keane: govt hoisted by its own FOFA petard

Crikey politics editor








The failure of the government's long-running attempt to repeal the Future of Financial Advice laws has its genesis as much in decisions made at the end of 2013 as in Senator Jacqui Lambie's departure from the Palmer United Party and Labor's doggedness in pursuit of the outcome it achieved yesterday evening.

Right before Christmas last year, then-assistant treasurer Arthur Sinodinos snuck out the government's planned gutting of FOFA, intended to deliver on the Coalition's commitments to the big banks and AMP, which control retail superannuation, and the diminishing but still powerful segment of the financial planning industry that relies on conflicted remuneration. Key to Sinodinos' strategy was doing as much of the gutting as possible by regulation -- so much so that eventually a real legal question emerged as to whether regulations made under a piece of legislation could in effect void the legislation itself. But the regulatory route promised two benefits: it would be quicker -- regulations would take effect immediately despite a disallowance period, whereas legislation would not come into effect until passed -- and it would be lower profile. A clear aim of the government at that point was to minimise debate over the repeal.

It worked for a while, but not for long. Initially, Crikey was a lone voice in criticising the repeal, drawing on information provided by sources in both the industry and retail super camps. But to its credit, the Financial Review took on the issue and, for once, adopted a pro-consumer angle. Critics of the repeal began to multiply. By the time Sinodinos had stepped aside and Finance Minister Mathias Cormann, architect in opposition of the repeal, returned to take charge, it was in trouble. The astonishing revelations of the Senate Economics committee inquiry into Commonwealth Financial Planning, and the Australian Securities and Investments Commission's staggeringly inept "oversight" of it, were particularly damaging. When Clive Palmer declared the government could "stick it up their arse", it looked as though the repeal was dead in the water. But Cormann applied himself to talking Palmer around, and by the time Labor moved to both introduce and disallow the repeal regulations in July, Palmer stymied the effort and, via his three newly minted senators and Ricky Muir, handed the government, the big banks and financial planners a huge win.

"Regardless of the whingeing of a rump of financial planners, this is a win for consumers and for good policy."

But the flaw in the government's strategy then emerged: in disallowing regulations, you don't get just one bite at the cherry -- it's there for the biting for 15 sitting days. If the government had gone the legislative route and secured a deal with Palmer, the matter would have been settled for good. In its rush to deliver for the big banks, the government had left itself exposed if the deal with Palmer broke down. Labor tried again in October, and failed. Labor Senator Sam Dastyari didn't give up, and once Lambie and Palmer had fallen out, pursued the Tasmanian Senator. Ricky Muir was swayed by the evidence emerging the inquiry into forestry managed investment schemes involving Timbercorp and ANZ Bank, chaired by Dastyari. One of the well-known victims of the Timbercorp collapse, Naomi Halpern, who ended up with a $650,000 debt after advice from a conflicted accountant, Peter Holt, was in Parliament House yesterday to support the overturning of the repeal.

At the third attempt, with the backing of Muir and Lambie and other crossbench opponents of the repeal like Nick Xenophon, Labor secured the disallowance, after many hours of procedural manoeuvrings and filibustering by the government. In the end, Abbott just didn't have the numbers.

The retail super and financial advice sectors are now crying foul, calling the restoration of bans on conflicted remuneration, and requirements such as formally asking clients if advisers can charge them fees, as "catastrophic". Expect retail super to now launch a huge campaign, funded by the bottomless profits of the big banks, to portray yesterday's outcome as an economic disaster that needs urgent attention. But industry is also responsible for the mess it now finds itself in, having enthusiastically supported the government's determination to rush the repeal through parliament without proper scrutiny. This is an industry with a profound public image problem -- so bad that the big bank front group, the Financial Services Council, acutely embarrassed the government in September when it called for an end to self-regulation in the industry and the establishment of a statutory body to oversee financial planners (there's supposed to already be one, ASIC, but it is universally regarded as a joke).


Regardless of the whingeing of a rump of financial planners, this is a win for consumers and for good policy. Dastyari and Xenophon deserve credit for not giving up on FOFA and, yes, so too do Lambie and Muir, and the Greens who backed them. But they would never have had the opportunity to do it if the government hadn't used a half-smart trick to get its way in the first place.

Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:


  • No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave your comment

Guest Sunday, 29 March 2020