Click on our Secret Library of Evidence ------>

    BANKILEAKS Secret Library

Loan Application Forms (LAF's)  

    Bank Emails to Brokers  

    Then Click on 'VIEW NOTEBOOK'

Join us on facebook

facebook3           facebook2 


What BFCSA Does...

BFCSA investigates fraud involving lenders, spruikers and financial planners worldwide.  Full Doc, Low Doc, No Doc loans, Lines of Credit and Buffer loans appear to be normal profit making financial products, however, these loans are set to implode within seven years.  For the past two decades, Ms Brailey, President of BFCSA (Inc), has been a tireless campaigner, championing the cause of older and low income people around the Globe who have fallen victim to banking and finance scams.  She has found that people of all ages are being targeted by Bankers offering faulty lending products. BFCSA warn that anyone who has signed up for one of these financial products, is in grave danger of losing their home.


Articles View Hits

Whistleblowers' Corner!

To all mortgage brokers, BDMs and loan approval officers! 
Pls Call Denise: 0401 642 344 

"Confidentiality is assured."

Cartoon Corner

Lighten your load today and "Laugh all the way to the bank!"

Denise Brailey

Led by award-winning consumer advocate Denise Brailey, BFCSA (Inc) are a group of people who are concerned about the appalling growth of Loan Fraud around the world. BFCSA (Inc) is a not for profit organisation in the spirit of global community concern and justice.

Click on the Cluster Map.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Login
    Login Login form

BFCSA: Four Corners on Bank Fraud March 2013 - Pat McConnell comment "Casualties Pile Up"

  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 2234
  • Print

As casualties pile up, has our investment sector become too big to regulate properly?



  1. Pat McConnell

    Honorary Fellow, Macquarie University Applied Finance Centre at Macquarie University



The Conversation is funded by CSIRO, Melbourne, Monash, RMIT, UTS, UWA, ACU, ANU, Canberra, CDU, Curtin, Deakin, Flinders, Griffith, JCU, La Trobe, Massey, Murdoch, Newcastle, QUT, Swinburne, Sydney, UniSA, USC, USQ, UTAS, UWS, VU and Wollongong.


As the ABC’s Four Corners explored, small investors are being caught in an unregulated investment market, often with devastating results. Has the corporate regulator dropped the ball - or is it juggling too many? ABC Four Corners

Stephen Long’s story last night on the ABC’s Four Corners beautifully illustrated the human cost of financial misconduct, as retirees and widows described the pain of having lost their super funds and savings in dodgy financial schemes.

It is yet another in the heartbreaking tales of ordinary people coming to grief in the wash-up of the Global Financial Crisis, as in the USA and in the United Kingdom.

The difference is that politicians and regulators in the UK and USA are doing something about it.

The regulator responsible in the cases documented by Four Corners is the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC) whose chairman Greg Medcraft did not exactly cover himself with glory when questioned by Long.

After professing ignorance of information presented by the reporter (and there is absolutely no reason why Medcraft should be across all the details) he tried to shift the blame to his predecessor Tony D'Aloisio for failing to answer questions posed by an investor burnt in the collapse of Prime Trust.

To their credit, ASIC are bringing the Prime Trust case to court but, in the meantime, funds are frozen and retirees are forced back to work to make up for the losses.

In his interview, Medcraft shrugged his shoulders and claimed that preventing financial misconduct of this sort wasn’t actually ASIC’s problem, and stated that the regulation of the so-called shadow banking sector was deficient. This was not, however, the view of the Reserve Bank of Australia, which last year, denied there was a (big) shadow bankingproblem and, if there was, it was ASIC’s problem anyway.

There are layers of problems (and potential solutions) here, but the issues of consumer protection against financial misconduct, raised by Four Corners, have been aggressively tackled elsewhere. In the UK, with the new Financial Conduct Authority and in the United States with the new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau it has been recognised that a dual track is needed, more intrusive regulation to protect consumers from ever more complex financial products (and their spruikers) and better education for consumers.

Even more disclosure is not the answer. It is obvious that unscrupulous firms can hide details, for example about exorbitant intercompany management fees, in reams of fine print.

The front line for consumer protection in the financial sphere in Australia is ASIC through itsMoneySmart website, which “offer(s) you tips & tools to help you make the most of your money”. While well meaning, such as giving you advice to “pay off your loans and credit cards faster” (hardly rocket science) and to consider working longer if your super has been depleted by the GFC (hardly compassionate) it is a mishmash of different “tools and calculators”.

The information given by the calculators is, at times, misleading and, sometimes, downright wrong.

Consider the following screen from the MoneySmart superannuation calculator of a hypothetical 25-year-old earning $50,000 per year and his/her super balance at retirement.

The calculator states gives a precise balance of $402,776 - while also pointing out it is just an estimated projection. Now the only thing we do know for certain is that the balance is highly unlikely to be precisely $402,776 (so-called false precision). In fact, the only thing we do know for certain is that we don’t know what the balance will be because there are so many uncertainties.



A recent piece in the Conversation by Graham Wells highlighted the problems of economic forecasting over even a three or four-year horizon, never mind the 40 years of the MoneySmart calculator. Such precision is less economic forecasting than looking at tea-leaves or chicken entrails. Professor Wells gives some good advice “when it comes to economic forecasting, it’s wise to admit to uncertainty”.

But ASIC admits no uncertainty. In its statement of ‘strategic priorities’ number One is to have “confident and informed investors and financial consumers” and within that the top objective is “education - investor responsibility for investment decisions remains core to our system, understanding risk and reward and diversification is paramount”. The superannuation calculator provides absolutely no indication of the risks inherent in the 40-year journey to retirement.

ASIC’s remit is huge. It is the corporate regulator, looking into matters of corporate governance for millions of companies, large and small, throughout Australia. It has a licensing role for credit intermediaries. It is an investigating and prosecuting body for corporate malfeasance. And, furthermore, it has just picked up the gig of regulating market operators, such as the ASX.

The question must be asked, has ASIC become too big to do its job thoroughly? Note this is not ASIC’s problem, but is the fault of the politicians who set the system up in the first place.

ASIC has a lot on its plate; it is hardly surprising that sometimes things fall through the cracks. Other jurisdictions have recognised the increasing complexity of the financial landscape and the problems faced by an ageing baby boomer generation unused to this new landscape and have taken strong action. They have realised the need for more focus in this area.

The huge Australian Superannuation pot (some $1.5 trillion of which almost one third is inSelf-Managed Super Funds) and the Australian obsession with property as an investment vehicle is, as history has amply demonstrated, a honey pot for unscrupulous shysters.

And unless one believes that somehow Australian financial institutions are more moral than others, AND Australian regulators are much better than those in the rest of the world, AND that the Australian consumer possesses superior financial knowledge and skills than consumers elsewhere, there is a case for considering what other jurisdictions have done and beef up consumer protection.

The best time to fight a financial crisis is before it happens, not after.

Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:


  • doyla66
    doyla66 Thursday, 13 March 2014


    So they FREEZE their money but don't FREEZE our TOXIC loans....
    It's all arse about Greggy
    What's going on in the head of yours?
    Wake up Greggy....
    You will soon need to jump on SEEK.COM

  • doyla66
    doyla66 Thursday, 13 March 2014

    So now Getsmart has another flawed calculation up and running! Might as well have loaded up instructions on how to read the tea leaves and how to pluck a duck for when you end up homeless! Not that I want to put a damper on things of course but would not an on-line poker machine be more appropriate?

Leave your comment

Guest Thursday, 04 June 2020