GLOBAL SUB-PRIME CRISIS

BANKILEAKS

Click on our Secret Library of Evidence ------>

    BANKILEAKS Secret Library

Loan Application Forms (LAF's)  

    Bank Emails to Brokers  

    Then Click on 'VIEW NOTEBOOK'

Join us on facebook
 

facebook3           facebook2 

BFCSA
MORTGAGE
DISTRESS SOS

What BFCSA Does...

BFCSA investigates fraud involving lenders, spruikers and financial planners worldwide.  Full Doc, Low Doc, No Doc loans, Lines of Credit and Buffer loans appear to be normal profit making financial products, however, these loans are set to implode within seven years.  For the past two decades, Ms Brailey, President of BFCSA (Inc), has been a tireless campaigner, championing the cause of older and low income people around the Globe who have fallen victim to banking and finance scams.  She has found that people of all ages are being targeted by Bankers offering faulty lending products. BFCSA warn that anyone who has signed up for one of these financial products, is in grave danger of losing their home.

Visitors

Articles View Hits
728074

Whistleblowers' Corner!

To all mortgage brokers, BDMs and loan approval officers! 
Pls Call Denise: 0401 642 344 

"Confidentiality is assured."

Cartoon Corner

Lighten your load today and "Laugh all the way to the bank!"

Lee Doyle

Led by award-winning consumer advocate Denise Brailey, BFCSA (Inc) are a group of people who are concerned about the appalling growth of Loan Fraud around the world. BFCSA (Inc) is a not for profit organisation in the spirit of global community concern and justice.

Click on the Cluster Map.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Login
    Login Login form

BFCSA: For the swindler, our ''disclosure'' regime is a thing of beauty

Posted by on in Corrupt Regulators
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 2188
  • 5 Comments
  • Print

When regulation buck stops with consumer

Date April 13, 2013        
  • Michael West                   

Michael West  Business columnist

In Saudi Arabia, a wallet lost in the street is routinely returned to its owner, contents intact. The crime rate is low, theft being somewhat discouraged by the spectre of people's fingers dangling from bits of string in the town square. In the financial arena in Australia, however, it is the victim rather than the perpetrator who is increasingly at fault.

That is why we continue to roll out the ''investor education'' solution. For the swindler, our ''disclosure'' regime is a thing of beauty. As long as - as stipulated in sub-clause 3(C), section F of the material contracts notes in the product disclosure statement - it is disclosed that your savings may be channelled to an entity in the Cayman Islands via a related party of the scheme promoter in Hong Kong, then the scheme is compliant.

Disclosure doth make fools of us all. The thing, according to the policy classes, is that the public is not educated enough. And this is why there is an undeniable policy sway, away from simply busting crooks and penalising breaches, to flooding the world with pamphlets and seminars. Education is cheap and easy while prosecution is expensive.

Have you heard of the Commonwealth Financial Counselling program? How about the joint Australian Financial Counselling and Credit Reform Association? Does Financial Counselling Australia ring a bell? You must have heard of the Australian Communications Consumer Action Network standing committee on consumer affairs? The ASIC consumer advisory panel? How about the Helping Our Kids Understand Finances - Professional Learning and MoneySmart Schools? Er … the Commonwealth Consumer Affairs Advisory Council perchance? The National Financial Literacy Strategy? Well, you paid for it all, sometimes at $5000 a pop for a country-town seminar by an investment guru to a crowd of eight.

In creating compulsory super, the government not only spawned a fat ecosystem of financial intermediaries, but a policy and consumer protection elite, too. If you look up the directors and executives on the aforementioned gravy train of initials you will find the same names bob up time and again, and often cross over into industry peak-body-land.

Take the Financial Ombudsman Service, for instance. No doubt these people are worthy and in most cases dedicated. But the whole approach is wrong. It is simply the government passing the regulation buck to the poor old consumer. Even sophisticated investors get dudded.

The latest initiative in consumer education and advocacy is the Choice Superannuation Consumer Centre proposal, billed by the ABC's 7.30 as the ''new super watchdog''. Canberra has committed $10 million to Choice to set up a company and Choice has committed to match it with $10 million from industry. Choice was coy on who might be involved, but in a clip on 7.30 showed former Macquarie Bank chief Allan Moss, former ASIC chairman turned liquidator Tony D'Aloisio and former Victorian premier Steve Bracks were somehow in the mix. We surely can look forward to more reams of strategy, and long hours of workshops complemented by forums, vision statements and media releases.

Regulation by pamphlets is how consumer advocate Denise Brailey describes it. Ms Brailey, with nary a donation from the public purse, has worked her day job for years and looked after thousands of victims of financial fraud in her spare time. Apparently, the mission of the new super centre is not only to further educate the masses but to provide policy and ''advocacy''. This means saying ''good product/bad product'', in which case they will be in need of a few lawyers, not to mention forensic types who can figure out the Byzantine financial engineering behind newfangled derivative products. Even if they got that right, and had the intestinal fortitude to call a product a rip off, what of the conflict of interest in an industry-funded advisory service?

We saw the kerfuffle on Thursday over freedom-of-information revelations that the government stripped out $500 million in dividends from the Reserve Bank, against the advice of governor Glenn Stevens. It is worth contemplating, too, that ASIC is a colossal cash cow for Canberra and, whoever the Sir Humphrey Appleby is down there, his advice would be: ''Yes, minister, we earn billions from the regulators. They fund the needy, not to mention our most urgent budgetary needs. Investor education is by far the most efficient weapon in our crusade against white-collar crime … it only costs us a few million, minister.''

 Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/business/when-regulation-buck-stops-with-consumer-20130412-2hqzp.html#ixzz2Qno3M8qx

Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:

Comments

  • doyla66
    doyla66 Thursday, 18 April 2013

    Back to the Future - more Australian consumer abandonment

    Brilliant expose! Thankyou to Michael West and to Arree and Denise for sharing it.
    What a horrifying prospect - back to the future! - more of the same plus more old hack vampires managing the blood bank! More "yes Minister". More limp lettuce leaves. Erk! No sign of real improvement there whatsoever. All tokenism, lacking depth of perception of the actual needs of their notional target market.
    I hope other consumers can see this as well and question the wisdom, or otherwise, of this effort by government that provides employment to old hands who oversaw some of the worst excesses of banking and consumer ignorance. Is it remotely possible that this is an effort to rehabilitate Tony and Mackers on the public purse? More likely just "jobs for the boys"!!!
    The danger of limp educational programs is that government can get away with thinking they have satisfied the extent of their responsibility. Nothing could be further from the truth. I suggest they ask BFCSA members (for a fee) to review all their communications, literature, website and marketing initiatives and proposals before wasting their money on more tree recycling and death by power point seminar and printed matter excess.
    While the Saudi deterrent is extreme and abhorent to Australian culture there is clearly a huge need for law and order advocates to get stuck into the lack of consistent law enforcement in consumer issues. Without enforcement the Law is a theory and a pointless waste of time and money.
    So no more nonsense. Obviously the budget belt needs further tightening. Why add to the long list of NGOs, councils and committees which overlap in their jurisdictions and recycle old banksters and their bureaucratic mates? Streamline the entire process in one Australian Consumer Protection Agency that actually listens to consumers and considers their needs in practical ways. If our government can't manage that, BFCSA will! :)

  • Denise
    Denise Thursday, 18 April 2013

    Time to go to the Human Rights Commission re abuse of regulatory powers by FOS, COSL and ASIC and the dis- empowerment of consumers of banking products and services. [email protected]

  • Denise
    Denise Thursday, 18 April 2013

    Time to go to the Human Rights Commission re abuse of regulatory powers by FOS, COSL and ASIC and the dis- empowerment of consumers of banking products and services. [email protected]

  • Denise
    Denise Thursday, 18 April 2013

    Time to go to the Human Rights Commission re abuse of regulatory powers by FOS, COSL and ASIC and the dis- empowerment of consumers of banking products and services. [email protected]

  • doyla66
    doyla66 Thursday, 18 April 2013

    Yes please, Denise.

Leave your comment

Guest Friday, 14 August 2020