Click on our Secret Library of Evidence ------>

    BANKILEAKS Secret Library

Loan Application Forms (LAF's)  

    Bank Emails to Brokers  

    Then Click on 'VIEW NOTEBOOK'

Join us on facebook

facebook3           facebook2 


What BFCSA Does...

BFCSA investigates fraud involving lenders, spruikers and financial planners worldwide.  Full Doc, Low Doc, No Doc loans, Lines of Credit and Buffer loans appear to be normal profit making financial products, however, these loans are set to implode within seven years.  For the past two decades, Ms Brailey, President of BFCSA (Inc), has been a tireless campaigner, championing the cause of older and low income people around the Globe who have fallen victim to banking and finance scams.  She has found that people of all ages are being targeted by Bankers offering faulty lending products. BFCSA warn that anyone who has signed up for one of these financial products, is in grave danger of losing their home.


Articles View Hits

Whistleblowers' Corner!

To all mortgage brokers, BDMs and loan approval officers! 
Pls Call Denise: 0401 642 344 

"Confidentiality is assured."

Cartoon Corner

Lighten your load today and "Laugh all the way to the bank!"

Denise Brailey

Led by award-winning consumer advocate Denise Brailey, BFCSA (Inc) are a group of people who are concerned about the appalling growth of Loan Fraud around the world. BFCSA (Inc) is a not for profit organisation in the spirit of global community concern and justice.

Click on the Cluster Map.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Login
    Login Login form

BFCSA: China Huaxia Bankster PONZI's same as Australia

Posted by on in Bankers A Law Unto Themselves
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 2120
  • Print

Huaxia scandal spotlights China's Ponzi crisis


Without tight financial regulation, risky wealth products are thriving on the mainland and could spark a liquidity crisis

Daniel Ren in ShanghaiThis email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it." style="color: #000000; line-height: 1em; margin-top: 0px; padding-bottom: 2px; display: block; font-size: 12px;">This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

It is an all-too-familiar tale. Depositors trust a bank with their cash in the hope their wealth will be managed well, only to find that the money has evaporated at the end of the agreed term.

In the latest scandal to rock China's banking industry, dozens of depositors lost their multimillion-yuan investments in a "wealth management product" (WMP) sold at a Shanghai branch of Huaxia Bank.

The sorry saga was a rude reminder that Ponzi schemes thrive on the mainland, where millions of residents still believe that banks are the safest havens for their lifelong savings.

On Tuesday evening, more than 40 depositors protested against alleged malfeasance by Huaxia Bank at an outlet in Jiading district in Shanghai.

They vented their anger at the bank after being informed that Zhongding Wealth Investment Centre, which issued a WMP to them last year, would be defaulting on its repayment to them.

"Huaxia is a state-owned bank, and to some extent, it is doing business under the government's directions," an investor surnamed Gong said. "How can we trust the government and the Communist Party … now that a state-owned bank refuses to pay our money back?"

Fitch Ratings says mainland commercial banks have sold an aggregate 12 trillion yuan (HK$14.9 trillion) in WMPs, most of which offer a higher yield than banks' deposit rates and so are attracting an increasing number of customers.

Gong, a retired worker, said she was convinced by Pu Tingting, a customer manager at the Jiading outlet, that the Zhongding product was worth buying.

"She told me the branch's chief had also bought the product," Gong said. "I trusted the bank and its staff, so I decided to buy, too."

The WMP offered an annualised interest rate of 11 per cent, more than triple the benchmark deposit rate set by the central bank.

Huaxia Bank said in a statement that Pu was a rogue employee and the product was sold without the bank's authorisation.

An official at the Jiading outlet, who was from the bank's Beijing headquarters and declined to be identified, told the South China Morning Post that Pu had been taken by Shanghai police, who are carrying out a criminal investigation.

The victims said their total investment in the Zhongding product could amount to more than 500 million yuan.

Xiao Gang, chairman of Bank of China, warned the number of defaults in similar schemes could soar in the future and eventually trigger a liquidity crisis in the banking system.

Mainland banks worked closely with trust companies or other entities that package trust loans into WMPs, with the lenders acting as middlemen to sell the products, Xiao wrote in a commentary published in the China Daily in October.

The Zhongding WMP provides a vivid snapshot of the practices the institutions engage in. Zhongding raised the money through Huaxia Bank to fund the construction of car dealerships in Henan province. The victims said Huaxia Bank informed them the borrower was found to have committed crimes.

"Shouldn't Huaxia take responsibility?" said Zhou Guowu, an investor who spent 500,000 yuan on the Zhongding product.

A report on internet portal NetEase reported that Pu's husband said she had been made a scapegoat by the bank.

At least five investors claimed they knew Pu well and said the bank encouraged her to promote the sale of the Zhongding WMP.

"Our money was deposited into Huaxia's accounts via the branch's counters," said one investor. "For ignorant investors like us, we were buying Huaxia Bank's product and we want our money back from Huaxia."

An official with Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, who asked not to be named, said the WMP sector had recently been spinning out of control in a fundraising spree.

"Lacking efficient regulations, more scandals are set to surface as banks blindly and aggressively issue WMPs," he said. "What's worse, to our knowledge, some customer managers are helping cash-hungry businesses raise funds through the WMPs without official approval from the banks."

About 55 per cent of outstanding WMPs were scheduled to mature this quarter, and a further 19 per cent would expire in the next quarter, Fitch said.

It said WMPs at mainland banks grew 3.5 trillion yuan in the first nine months of this year, of which 85 per cent were sold by mid-size joint-stock or city and rural commercial banks.

"Proceeds raised from the products containing credit can be used to repay, roll over or purchase borrowers' existing loans," Charlene Chu, Fitch's head of Chinese bank ratings, said in a report. "This can give the appearance of high repayment rates of corporate loans - and by extension, strong banking-sector asset quality and corporate-sector health - when, in fact, the loans are not being repaid by borrowers themselves but rather by investors."

Xiao, who is tipped to replace Zhou Xiaochuan in March as the central bank's governor, has compared the proliferation of WMPs on the mainland to shadow banking.

"Regular banking and shadow banking are not isolated from each other," he wrote in the commentary. "Many activities in the two systems feed into each other and could influence each other if things start to deteriorate."

Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:


  • doyla66
    doyla66 Monday, 10 December 2012

    Who needs conspiracy theories! It is evident all around us that we have a global epidemic of criminal banking activity.
    "Regular banking and shadow banking are not isolated from each other," he wrote in the commentary. "Many activities in the two systems feed into each other and could influence each other if things start to deteriorate."

    This bank is 20% owned by Deutsche Bank who have very sinister connections dating back to world war 1.
    Now I want to know what this 'shadow banking' is that I've heard about, and I now realise that the banks must be running two sets of books... One that shows the truth and one for the tax department.

  • doyla66
    doyla66 Tuesday, 11 December 2012

    In Australia in the 1990s, it was the CBA taken to the Senate over their shadow banking ledgers. They were the leaders in the naughty pack way back then. What's the likelihood they are still underhandedly operating those?

Leave your comment

Guest Thursday, 26 November 2020