GLOBAL SUB-PRIME CRISIS

BANKILEAKS

Click on our Secret Library of Evidence ------>

    BANKILEAKS Secret Library

Loan Application Forms (LAF's)  

    Bank Emails to Brokers  

    Then Click on 'VIEW NOTEBOOK'

Join us on facebook
 

facebook3           facebook2 

BFCSA
MORTGAGE
DISTRESS SOS

What BFCSA Does...

BFCSA investigates fraud involving lenders, spruikers and financial planners worldwide.  Full Doc, Low Doc, No Doc loans, Lines of Credit and Buffer loans appear to be normal profit making financial products, however, these loans are set to implode within seven years.  For the past two decades, Ms Brailey, President of BFCSA (Inc), has been a tireless campaigner, championing the cause of older and low income people around the Globe who have fallen victim to banking and finance scams.  She has found that people of all ages are being targeted by Bankers offering faulty lending products. BFCSA warn that anyone who has signed up for one of these financial products, is in grave danger of losing their home.

Visitors

Articles View Hits
655850

Whistleblowers' Corner!

To all mortgage brokers, BDMs and loan approval officers! 
Pls Call Denise: 0401 642 344 

"Confidentiality is assured."

Cartoon Corner

Lighten your load today and "Laugh all the way to the bank!"

Denise Brailey

Led by award-winning consumer advocate Denise Brailey, BFCSA (Inc) are a group of people who are concerned about the appalling growth of Loan Fraud around the world. BFCSA (Inc) is a not for profit organisation in the spirit of global community concern and justice.

Click on the Cluster Map.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Login
    Login Login form

BFCSA: Banks refuse to pay pitiful $12 million compo for Billion dollar scandal on Low Doc Fraud inside banks

Posted by on in ROYAL COMMISSION URGENT
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 2124
  • 1 Comment
  • Print

Big banks back overhaul of advice industry but baulk at funding compo

Banking and Finance

Date December 14, 2014 - 3:33PM


Clancy Yeates


http://www.smh.com.au/business/banking-and-finance/big-banks-back-overhaul-of-advice-industry-but-baulk-at-funding-compo-20141214-126rt9.html

After a year of turmoil in financial advice, big banks are supporting the creation of a public adviser register, more disclosure of licence ownership, and tighter rules on who can call themselves an adviser.

Yet the industry is at odds with the Financial Ombudsman Service over its call for a industry-funded "last resort" compensation scheme for victims of bad advice.

New submissions from the Commonwealth Bank, Westpac, Macquarie Group and AMP support the government's plan to give consumers more information about an adviser's history including any bans, their qualifications, and the company that is employing them.

The submissions have been made to a Senate committee investigating the level of consumer protection for financial advice clients, an issue that has come to the fore after the government's move to roll back Labor's advice laws was abruptly scuttled in the Senate last month.

The three banks and AMP backed the Coalition's plan to start a public industry-wide register of advisers by March 2015. The register is also intended to give consumers clearer information about the licence holder, such as a bank, for which the adviser is ultimately working.

Most banks also agree there is a need for clearer descriptions of what constitutes "advice", as opposed to sales.  Westpac and CBA both argue that people providing "general advice", which does not take into account a customer's circumstances, should not be able to call themselves financial advisers.

The financial system inquiry chaired by former CBA chief David Murray also recommended this change, saying there was currently a risk that consumers misinterpreted or relied excessively on material that was in fact advertising.

The debate over consumer protection comes after CBA and Macquarie were forced to expand compensation schemes for victims of bad advice this year.

CBA is offering to review any advice provided by Commonwealth Financial Planning or Financial Wisdom between 2003 and 2012, while Macquarie has been forced to write to 160,000 current and former clients of its Macquarie Private Wealth inviting them to participate in a compensation scheme.

But despite efforts such as these, the Financial Ombudsman Service said compensation for consumers who have lost money through bad advice was a "pressing issue" and there remains a significant gap in the law.

Since 2010, FOS has ordered $12.5 million in compensation that has not been paid to customers, as the companies involved had collapsed or no longer had financial services licences. To address the issue it argued that all licensees should be charged a fee to fund a last resort compensation scheme.  "Consumers must have confidence that if things go wrong, they will be compensated when a decision is made in their favour," the FOS submission says.

The industry, however, is pushing back against any new mandatory compensation scheme.

A submission from the Financial Services Council, which represents for-profit wealth managers, cited a 2012 government-commissioned report that said a last resort compensation scheme would be "inappropriate, and possibly counter-productive" and would not lift standards in the industry.

The Senate inquiry comes as financial advice laws remain politically controversial.  Opposition and crossbench senators calling themselves the "coalition of common sense" last month scrapped the government's rollback of Labor's financial advice laws, citing concerns consumers were being left worse off.

 

It is unclear whether the government will try to reach a compromise with the senators, some of whom, such as Labor's Sam Dastyari and independent Nick Xenophon, are involved in the current inquiry.

Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:

Comments

  • Louie2U
    Louie2U Monday, 23 February 2015

    FOS always was a toothless tiger. It can make any recommendation it likes but when it has conflicted interests operating within its very core, nothing will eventuate. Unless, we have some ballsy politicians who are prepared to lobby their peers and push the case hard to get some clear resolution.
    Ahhhh - another dream (sorry, folks :p)

Leave your comment

Guest Sunday, 08 December 2019