GLOBAL SUB-PRIME CRISIS

BANKILEAKS

Click on our Secret Library of Evidence ------>

    BANKILEAKS Secret Library

Loan Application Forms (LAF's)  

    Bank Emails to Brokers  

    Then Click on 'VIEW NOTEBOOK'

Join us on facebook
 

facebook3           facebook2 

BFCSA
MORTGAGE
DISTRESS SOS

What BFCSA Does...

BFCSA investigates fraud involving lenders, spruikers and financial planners worldwide.  Full Doc, Low Doc, No Doc loans, Lines of Credit and Buffer loans appear to be normal profit making financial products, however, these loans are set to implode within seven years.  For the past two decades, Ms Brailey, President of BFCSA (Inc), has been a tireless campaigner, championing the cause of older and low income people around the Globe who have fallen victim to banking and finance scams.  She has found that people of all ages are being targeted by Bankers offering faulty lending products. BFCSA warn that anyone who has signed up for one of these financial products, is in grave danger of losing their home.

Visitors

Articles View Hits
631477

Whistleblowers' Corner!

To all mortgage brokers, BDMs and loan approval officers! 
Pls Call Denise: 0401 642 344 

"Confidentiality is assured."

Cartoon Corner

Lighten your load today and "Laugh all the way to the bank!"

Denise Brailey

Led by award-winning consumer advocate Denise Brailey, BFCSA (Inc) are a group of people who are concerned about the appalling growth of Loan Fraud around the world. BFCSA (Inc) is a not for profit organisation in the spirit of global community concern and justice.

Click on the Cluster Map.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Login
    Login Login form

BFCSA: Bankers' evil CALCULATORS and how ASIC led discussions 2002 - 2005 Class Order CO 05/1122

Posted by on in ROYAL COMMISSION URGENT
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 2227
  • 3 Comments
  • Print

 

http://actuaries.asn.au/Library/1400%20Langton-Wickham.pdf

 

 

5th Financial Services Forum  Renovating the Financial System  13 and 14 May 2010 Sydney

 

Current Issues:Super Benefit Projections,Web-calculators and Fee Disclosure
Benefit Projections Working Group

 (printed) Benefit projections

  • Web calculators
  • Fees and costs

Olden days
ISC circulars 2003ish
FSR advice / Calculators withdrawn 2004
IAAust Guidance 2005
Web calculator class order 05/1122
July 2008 ASIC consultation paper 101
April 2009 IAAust GN revised 2009
July 2009 Intra fund advice class order (09/210)
Oct 2009  ASIC consultation paper 122 / Draft RegulatoryGuide
Jan 2010 Australian Govt Actuary consultation April 2010
Cooper –suggested compulsory projections as part of MySuper

 

 

Benefit Projections -proposed ASIC rules (CP122)

 

• Printed Statements (not calculators)
• Voluntary not mandatory
• Relief from advice requirements Corp Law
• Once a year with Benefit statements
• Doesn’t apply to DB(?), SMSFs, ERFs
• Prescribed assumptions
• Some standard disclosure eg:
• today’sdollars deflated by wage based measures
•Conversion to income stream

 

Benefit Projections -proposed ASIC rules (CP122)

 

• Must NOT include age pension
• Standardised fees
• Only one calculation –cannot show impact of additional conts / different retirement age

 

Benefit Projections -proposed ASIC rules (CP122)

 

• Prescribed assumptions set by ASIC based on advice by Australia Government Actuary:
• Investment Return,
• Inflation,
• Fees,
• Longevity
• Proposed approach –commutation factors

 

Benefit Projections -proposed ASIC rules (CP122)

 

IAAust view:
• Conflicting interaction with intra fund advice
• Should be less prescription for voluntary projections (eg fee basis, more than one contribution basis etc)
• Allow more than once a year
• Allow age pension

 

“SuperFunds” Feb 2010 –John Burnett

 

“…it should be possible for the Australian Government Actuary to establish [on specified assumptions] a  table which shows for each level of superannuation income [in today’s dollars], the corresponding combined income including the age pension.”

 

Benefit Projections -Intra fund advice rules

 

• Printed Benefit Projections are financial product advice and need to be issued as Statement of Advice
• Impractical to do this for large funds as need to have “reasonable basis for advice”
• Intra fund advice class order removes this obstacle
• No restrictions on assumptions etc

 

Benefit Projections –Cooper (MySuper)

 

Forecast of Retirement benefits.....................The Panel believes that possibly the largest engagement hurdle is getting members to understand whether their current contribution strategy is likely to provide them with an adequate income in retirement.  This involes the multi-tiered challenges of focusing them on future events, current savings habits and the conversion of their lump-sum thinking into replacement rate thinking; what proportion of their income will they need to live on in retirement?   The closest thing to addressing these challenges are the current policy ideas embodied in ASIC's Consultation Paper 122 Superannuation Forecasts.  The Panel believes these ideas should become mandatory for Mysuper products , subject to further refinement of the policy ideas in ASIC's consultation process.

 

Web calculators

 

• Exempt from advice provisions –Class Order 05/1122


• IAAust argued for same rules for both printed and calculators


• Class Order requires Reasonable Basis for assumptions / no prescription


• CP122 says Reasonable Basis best satisfied by being “as close as possible”

to printed projections basis

 

Fees and cost disclosure

 

• Short form PDS draft regulations
• Ripoll
• Cooper / IAAust submission

 

Fees and costs -PDS

 

• Requires a projection of fees and costs over 10 years.
• Expressed as a % of assets
• No split admin / investment
• IAAust and ASFA expressed concerns re potential to be misleading
• Consultation concluded:

 

Standard example of our balanced option:..............Based on the fees and cost outlines above if you transfer an existing super balance of $100,000 into a balanced option and a further $5,000 goes in each year for the next 10 years you have paid up to $25,000 if you withdraw at the end of 10 yearsThis is an overall cost of 1.3% of your balance per year.  This is based on standard assumptions that all super funds must use.  This means you can use this example to compare XYZ's fees and costs with other funds.  However, the actual fees and costs you will pay will depend on what investment options you choose and how well those investments perform.

 

Fees and costs –Ripoll + “The future of financial advice”(govt response)

 

• Big items: remuneration and duties
• Disclosure recommendations accepted by Govt:
• Improved disclosure of remuneration / conflicts through FSGs
• Adviser Charging regime –“Dollar based” disclosure of remuneration

 

Fees and costs -Cooper

 

“My Super”:


• No cross-subsidisation / formal policy on cost allocation
• Separate accounting for MySuper division
• No entry fees / Exit fees cost recovery only
• Fee schedules / discounts to be explicit
• Performance based fees to meet standards
• Benchmarking of “administration costs per member”

 

 

 

https://www.asic.gov.au/asic/asic.nsf/byheadline/IR+05-64+ASIC+releases+policy+on+calculators?openDocument

 

 Attachment to [IR 05-64]: ASIC releases a new policy on the regulation of generic financial calculators

[CO 05/1122] provides licensing or disclosure and conduct relief for providers of financial calculators that meet certain minimum conditions. The relief only applies where:

  • the calculator does not advertise or promote a specific financial product;
  • if the calculator is an electronic facility or device, the calculator enables a person using it to alter the default assumptions applied by the calculator (other than a statutory assumption that reflects a rate or amount of fixed by legislation) and performs a calculation using the changed assumptions;
  • the default assumptions applied by the calculator are, unless changed by the user, reasonable;
  • the calculator will display to the user in the ordinary course of its use or have printed on it all of the following:
    • a clear and prominent statement about the purpose and limitations of the calculator;
    • a clear and prominent explanation of why the default assumptions, including any statutory assumption, are reasonable;
    • a clear and prominent explanation of the impact of any significant limitation of the calculator;
    • where the calculator estimates an amount payable at a future time—a clear and prominent statement specifying whether or not the estimate takes into account an assumed change in the cost of living between the time of the preparation of the estimate and the future time; and
    • a clear and prominent statement to the effect that the calculator is not intended to be relied on for the purposes of making a decision in relation to a financial product and that the user should consider obtaining advice from a financial services licensee before making any financial decisions;
  • if the calculator is an electronic facility or device—the calculator does not prevent the user from readily printing or electronically storing the estimate; and
  • the provider keeps a copy of the calculator for 7 years from when it is first made available.

[CO 05/1122] also revokes Class Order [CO 05/611] Relief for providers of superannuation calculators. [CO 05/611] provided licensing or conduct and disclosure relief to providers of generic superannuation calculators. Providers of generic superannuation calculators can now rely on [CO 05/1122].

 

http://www.asic.gov.au/cp

 

 

 

Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:

Comments

  • doyla66
    doyla66 Monday, 14 April 2014

    These could be questions for the Financial Inquiry, if anyone there gave a hoot about consumers ....
    If Banks can predict the performance of a superannuation fund, does this mean -
    * They can predict it because they drive the market fluctuations?
    * They can predict it because they're good at crystal ball gazing?
    If they get the predictions wrong, what protection does a consumer have?
    Is there such a thing as Investment insurance?
    Or do Banks write clauses in small print so the risk is all the consumers?
    Are some investments really capital guaranteed or is that a bait to appeal to conservative investors?
    If an investment fails, what comeback apart from FOS, ASIC and lawyers does the consumer have in reality?
    How can an investor best protect themselves and their investment?
    Keeping consumers out of the Financial Inquiry is like trying to run a shop without customers. I think they all need to get out of their ivory towers, go do some small business training (very comprehensive) and get a clear picture of the value of their consumers. Repeatedly I see Banks doing it all wrong, as if they've never learned the basics of business and especially marketing.
    I wish them good luck. We can all see lots of lovely high rise offices being empty because the clever Aussie consumers went looking for consumer friendly products, financial assistance, financial staff and honest, authentic companies that actually deliver more than they promote.

  • Denise
    Denise Monday, 14 April 2014

    Yes Transformer. Exactly like rigging the horse race - setting the outcome prior to race finish and then running home with the prize. How do ASIC explain condoning that one???? [email protected]

  • doyla66
    doyla66 Monday, 14 April 2014

    Denise, I think rigging the game is the equivalent of Bank risk management. Certainly in investing, which includes property buying. Values drop, Banks cull whatever they can - values go up Banks send the brokers door to door signing up ARIPs and everyone they can into a "deal".
    They wanted risk free credit provision - so some bright young things from JPM had a slap up weekend in 1994 and ta-da, securitisation was born.
    What consumers need to learn from the big end of town is how to negotiate a better risk deal for themselves.
    Alternatively, run and shut the front door when they come to town touting their cheap loans and capital guaranteed investment (yeah, guaranteed to stay in the pocket of the Bank, not return to yours!)
    Without a real financial regulator and real consumer protection it really is that bad.
    Just get seriously "burned" once - you'll never forget the experience, it's devastating. That's if you survive it, as many don't.
    Stay safe - stay out of the water - assume that if it's wearing a collar and tie and talking finance it's a shark and it's dangerous.

Leave your comment

Guest Wednesday, 18 September 2019