Click on our Secret Library of Evidence ------>

    BANKILEAKS Secret Library

Loan Application Forms (LAF's)  

    Bank Emails to Brokers  

    Then Click on 'VIEW NOTEBOOK'

Join us on facebook

facebook3           facebook2 


What BFCSA Does...

BFCSA investigates fraud involving lenders, spruikers and financial planners worldwide.  Full Doc, Low Doc, No Doc loans, Lines of Credit and Buffer loans appear to be normal profit making financial products, however, these loans are set to implode within seven years.  For the past two decades, Ms Brailey, President of BFCSA (Inc), has been a tireless campaigner, championing the cause of older and low income people around the Globe who have fallen victim to banking and finance scams.  She has found that people of all ages are being targeted by Bankers offering faulty lending products. BFCSA warn that anyone who has signed up for one of these financial products, is in grave danger of losing their home.


Articles View Hits

Whistleblowers' Corner!

To all mortgage brokers, BDMs and loan approval officers! 
Pls Call Denise: 0401 642 344 

"Confidentiality is assured."

Cartoon Corner

Lighten your load today and "Laugh all the way to the bank!"

Denise Brailey

Led by award-winning consumer advocate Denise Brailey, BFCSA (Inc) are a group of people who are concerned about the appalling growth of Loan Fraud around the world. BFCSA (Inc) is a not for profit organisation in the spirit of global community concern and justice.

Click on the Cluster Map.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Login
    Login Login form

BFCSA Australian Big Four Banks ready to bully the Federal Government over their dodgy lending practices

  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 2016
  • 1 Comment
  • Print

Breaking the big four’s bad habits

 The Murray Inquiry Threatens to corral Australian Banks' dodgy lending practices.  Big Banks Bad Business Model to steal homes.

6 October 2014

Callum Pickering


Australia’s major banks are getting desperate. The Murray Inquiry threatens to corral their dodgy lending practices and misleading accounting, prompting a last ditch effort by senior management to convince members of the inquiry that additional regulation is not required.

We shouldn't sugar-coat the situation: the Murray Inquiry poses a serious threat to the business model of Australia’s big four banks. That might sound dire, but don’t be fooled, this is a business model that should be threatened.  The inquiry itself -- the first into the financial sector in 17 years -- will be released in November. At the centre of the inquiry are two fundamental issues: the major bank’s low capital ratios and the government’s implicit guarantee of Australia’s financial system.

Those two factors go some way to explaining why three Australian banks -- almost entirely irrelevant outside our shores -- are currently among the biggest 20 banks in the world in terms of market capitalisation. The big four also sit in the top 50 global banks as measured by total assets.  Australia’s obsession with mortgage lending isn’t merely an accident. It’s an entirely rational (albeit short-sighted) and inevitable consequence of a financial system that perceives mortgage lending as less risky than business or personal lending.

Under the current regulatory regime, favouring mortgage lending allows the banks to effectively lend more, leverage themselves higher and generate greater profits. Christopher Joye at the Financial Review provides an excellent recap on how the system works. As long as house prices keep rising the banks can’t lose.

It’s a model that has been embraced by the banking community. Mortgage lending now accounts for almost 61 per cent of total outstanding domestic credit (compared with 45 per cent in 2000 and 24 per cent in 1990). Mortgage lending has accounted for almost 100 per cent of credit growth since the beginning of the global financial crisis.

But higher mortgage lending isn’t without its costs. An obvious implication has been higher house prices, while elevated land prices have created a significant cost -- and in some cases a barrier to entry -- for Australian businesses.  It’s also a business model that is built on unsustainable foundations. How long can the banking community starve the business sector – particularly small and medium-size enterprises – to feed the housing beast?

We should remember -- and the banks should bear in mind -- that it is the business community that underwrites the Australian housing market. They pay the incomes that become the mortgage repayments that enable the banks to post record profits year-after-year.   By starving the business community, our major banks are compromising productivity and income growth. Eventually that will put their mortgage holdings and business model at risk.  It’s rational in the short-term due to higher profitability and a stronger share price but it’s easy to see that it isn’t in the long-term interest of Australian shareholders or the business community.

The Murray Inquiry determined that “housing is also a potential source of systemic risk for the financial system and the economy.” The inquiry noted that “a large enough disruption to the housing market could have significant implications for household balance sheets, financial stability, economic growth, and the speed of recovery in housing spending and broader economy activity following a shock.”

Where the story becomes more concerning is that the taxpayer will be on the hook if it all goes belly up. The federal government’s implicit guarantee of the Australian financial system creates a situation where it’s heads they win and tails you lose.

The guarantee -- which has effectively lowered the cost of bank funding -- has come with no strings attached. It didn’t come with a government equity position, nor was it received with an expectation that banks would reduce their risk exposure.

According to a report by The Australian, “one source close to the inquiry suggested it was mulling more than doubling the big four’s charge for being ‘systemically important’ from an additional 1 percentage point of common-equity tier-one capital to 2.5 percentage points”. If that is realised, it will be a big victory for Australian taxpayers and the stability of the Australian financial system.

The major banks won’t accept this lying down and even once the inquiry is released they will direct their considerable influence towards the federal government. But make no mistake, the bank’s concerns warrant little attention and are entirely short-sighted and self-serving.  The Australian economy will benefit from a more diversified financial system -- one that not only finances housing speculation but also small- and medium-sized businesses. The system will also be improved by forcing the banks to bear a greater degree of the financial risk they create. Hopefully the Murray Inquiry will deliver on both fronts.




Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:


  • Jetfighter
    Jetfighter Wednesday, 08 October 2014

    There needs to be a better share of the market right across the board to establish a balanced and sustainable economy that will endure for all Australians into the future and restricting the greedy banks to comply with the Banking Code of Practise. It is obvious that the Banks cannot self regulate, they are like children in a candy store and we all know they will consume all until the inevitable, tears before bedtime.

Leave your comment

Guest Wednesday, 27 January 2021