GLOBAL SUB-PRIME CRISIS

BANKILEAKS

Click on our Secret Library of Evidence ------>

    BANKILEAKS Secret Library

Loan Application Forms (LAF's)  

    Bank Emails to Brokers  

    Then Click on 'VIEW NOTEBOOK'

Join us on facebook
 

facebook3           facebook2 

BFCSA
MORTGAGE
DISTRESS SOS

What BFCSA Does...

BFCSA investigates fraud involving lenders, spruikers and financial planners worldwide.  Full Doc, Low Doc, No Doc loans, Lines of Credit and Buffer loans appear to be normal profit making financial products, however, these loans are set to implode within seven years.  For the past two decades, Ms Brailey, President of BFCSA (Inc), has been a tireless campaigner, championing the cause of older and low income people around the Globe who have fallen victim to banking and finance scams.  She has found that people of all ages are being targeted by Bankers offering faulty lending products. BFCSA warn that anyone who has signed up for one of these financial products, is in grave danger of losing their home.

Visitors

Articles View Hits
649228

Whistleblowers' Corner!

To all mortgage brokers, BDMs and loan approval officers! 
Pls Call Denise: 0401 642 344 

"Confidentiality is assured."

Cartoon Corner

Lighten your load today and "Laugh all the way to the bank!"

Denise Brailey

Led by award-winning consumer advocate Denise Brailey, BFCSA (Inc) are a group of people who are concerned about the appalling growth of Loan Fraud around the world. BFCSA (Inc) is a not for profit organisation in the spirit of global community concern and justice.

Click on the Cluster Map.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Login
    Login Login form

BFCSA: ASIC gets serious on complaints. After 20 years? Highly unlikely

Posted by on in ROYAL COMMISSION URGENT
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 36998
  • 0 Comments
  • Print

ASIC gets serious on complaints

Australian Financial Review May 15, 2019 4.10pm

James Frost

 

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission wants banks, super funds and insurance companies to slash turnaround times for customer complaints.

The regulator believes the opaque and often confusing approach to how complaints are handled inside those institutions discourages customers from lodging complaints and leads to one in five complainants abandoning the process part way through.

Proposed new guidelines contained in consultation paper 311 include a strict set of rules for the acceptance, treatment and reporting of customer complaints, which the regulator expects will help not just consumers but the firms themselves.

ASIC deputy chairman Karen Chester said the need for effective systems of redress was a key finding of the banking royal commission. She described the revised regulatory guide for internal and external dispute resolution as a game-changer.

"It is widely acknowledged there is room for much improvement when it comes to handling consumer complaints in our financial system,” Ms Chester said.

“Consumers expect and need a fair, timely and effective way to have their complaints dealt with.”

The proposals have emerged out of consultation with consumers and observations made during the regulators program of embedding staff at financial services companies, known as close and continuous monitoring.

ASIC’s consumer research found evidence of consumer fatigue with the existing programs noting 18 per cent of those surveyed dropped out of the process before it concluded and 45 per cent of complainants who received an unfavourable outcome saying they did not receive an explanation.

Under the new guidelines financial services firms will be required to provide specific detail about why a particular conclusion was reached and apply a unique identification number for each complaint.

“We are concerned that the quality of IDR [internal dispute resolution] responses provided to complainants across the financial services sector is generally poor, particularly when a complaint is rejected or partially rejected by a financial firm,” the proposal reads.

With total bank compensation from issues inside wealth management arms reaching $8 billion following Monday’s announcement from Commonwealth Bank, it is believed the changes will assist the banks with early detection of systemic and non-financial risks before they crystallise.

David Locke is the chairman of the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), the mega ombudsman and dispute resolution body of last resort. He said the new standards would lead to more complaints being resolved quickly and potentially reducing wait times at AFCA.

“We also welcome the idea of requiring firms to provide a standard set of data – this will help companies know how they compare to their competitors and help to inform consumers about the companies they’re dealing with,” Mr Locke said.

Among the likely sticking points for financial institutions are ASIC’s demand that they reduce the maximum time frames for responding to a complaint from 90 days to 45 days for complaints about superannuation and from 45 days to 30 days for every other type of complaint.

ASIC will also require comprehensive reporting of complaints every six months and will have the power to make company level complaint data public.

The guidelines also require financial services companies to take complaints on social media seriously.

Companies are expected to follow up customer complaints made on a bank or financial institution's social media presence when a response has been requested and the complaint can be traced back to a customer.

In practical terms this means that a complaint on the Facebook page of a major bank from a verified user must be followed up while an anonymous spray tagging a bank on Twitter may be ignored.

AFCA’s Mr Locke said the proposal to ensure complaints made on social media were considered as serious as written complaints was sound.

“In this digital age, the move by ASIC to require firms to include complaints made on social media platforms, is entirely appropriate” he said.

 

Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:

Comments

  • No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave your comment

Guest Sunday, 17 November 2019