GLOBAL SUB-PRIME CRISIS

BANKILEAKS

Click on our Secret Library of Evidence ------>

    BANKILEAKS Secret Library

Loan Application Forms (LAF's)  

    Bank Emails to Brokers  

    Then Click on 'VIEW NOTEBOOK'

Join us on facebook
 

facebook3           facebook2 

BFCSA
MORTGAGE
DISTRESS SOS

What BFCSA Does...

BFCSA investigates fraud involving lenders, spruikers and financial planners worldwide.  Full Doc, Low Doc, No Doc loans, Lines of Credit and Buffer loans appear to be normal profit making financial products, however, these loans are set to implode within seven years.  For the past two decades, Ms Brailey, President of BFCSA (Inc), has been a tireless campaigner, championing the cause of older and low income people around the Globe who have fallen victim to banking and finance scams.  She has found that people of all ages are being targeted by Bankers offering faulty lending products. BFCSA warn that anyone who has signed up for one of these financial products, is in grave danger of losing their home.

Visitors

Articles View Hits
655842

Whistleblowers' Corner!

To all mortgage brokers, BDMs and loan approval officers! 
Pls Call Denise: 0401 642 344 

"Confidentiality is assured."

Cartoon Corner

Lighten your load today and "Laugh all the way to the bank!"

Lee Doyle

Led by award-winning consumer advocate Denise Brailey, BFCSA (Inc) are a group of people who are concerned about the appalling growth of Loan Fraud around the world. BFCSA (Inc) is a not for profit organisation in the spirit of global community concern and justice.

Click on the Cluster Map.

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Login
    Login Login form

ASIC: Watch-Puppy raises alarm "dodgy property spruikers" ~ more lick than bite

Posted by on in Corrupt Regulators
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 2346
  • 1 Comment
  • Print

--14 Nov, 2012: ASIC is undertaking "limited surveillance" of financial advisers and accountants over concerns that property spruikers are encouraging investors to set up self-managed super funds purely as vehicles for "dodgy"  property investments,--"it will be a target for fraudsters". Forever "researching", ASIC hopes to release research into this aspect of SMSF investing in 2013.

 
  • What is the old saying? Same S... Different Day. Regardless of the vehicle property spruikers are still doing the same thing they did last year, last decade and probably and the decade before. 

    For the biggest single investment a person will generally make, I find it hard to understand why there is such a lack of proper accountability and regulation within the property industry as a whole. In my opinion the whole building and property marketing/sales industry needs Government to give it a very clean sweep with a view to dramatically increasing protection for consumers.  Dale Gillham:~

     

by Larry Schlesinger: 

A~SIC puppy, raises alarm on "dodgy property spruikers" exploiting SMSF rules:~

The corporate watchdog also has a taskforce focused on the aggressive marketing of speculative property investments, according to report in The Australian.

"We don't want SMSFs to be the preferred vehicle for dodgy property spruikers," says ASIC commissioner Peter Kell.

Kell says being encouraged to set up a SMSF "solely to invest in direct property" should be a "warning sign" for consumers.

He says a big risk for SMSF investors is speculating on property in areas where they are less familiar.

This would suggest ASIC concerns about investing in areas such as remote mining towns, where new housing developments have been heavily promoted by marketeers.

According to Kell, in some cases investors are being flown to places like the Gold Coast, shown a property and then steered through all the steps necessary to set up the SMSF, including creating the holding trust required to act as custodian of the property and arranging the loan and purchase of the property.

Current tax rules do allow investors to put investment property into their SMSF and also borrow against the fund to acquire property - provided it is done at arm's length and with the appropriate structures.

But Kell says setting up a fund just to acquire and hold property is clearly in breach of the spirit of DIY funds by not achieving diversity and may also breach trustee obligations to maintain liquidity in the fund.

Investing in property through a SMSF holds significant tax advantages with the maximum rate of tax paid on rental income being 15% and falling to 0% if the SMSF is in the pension phase.

This compares with personally held property where rental income is taxed at a marginal tax rate, which in some cases can be as high as 46.5%.

"ASIC has concerns that people are being encouraged to set up SMSFs in situations where they don't have the resources, experience and understanding to ensure they actually generate the expected benefits," says Kell.

Kell says the resourcing issue is not just about money but having the time to properly manage your SMSF.

But he says ASIC is emphatically not anti-SMSF, but is worried that as the sector grows in popularity it will be a target for fraudsters.

ASIC hopes to release research into this aspect of SMSF investing in 2013.

This article first appeared on Property Observer.

Related Items :
 

Showing 1 comment

Sort by    Subscribe by email   Subscribe by RSS
 
  • What is the old saying? Same S... Different Day. Regardless of the vehicle property spruikers are still doing the same thing they did last year, last decade and probably and the decade before. 

    For the biggest single investment a person will generally make, I find it hard to understand why there is such a lack of proper accountability and regulation within the property industry as a whole. In my opinion the whole building and property marketing/sales industry needs Government to give it a very clean sweep with a view to dramatically increasing protection for consumers.   Dale Gillham

 

Last modified on
Rate this blog entry:

Comments

  • doyla66
    doyla66 Wednesday, 14 November 2012

    I agree with Dale. Property industry and real estate would both benefit from a real going through. This is why they have dodgy reputations - quite justifiably - and this makes it hard for straight decent property/real estate businesses to survive. In the end people eventually get to know who is trustworthy and who is not. But in tight times Real Estate Agents resort to some diabolical practices (e.g,. interfering in a tenancy until those tenants leave) in order to get a listing or sale. There seems to be no redress for property owners in that position.
    Once again self-regulation has failed and even with dispute resolution that doesn't suffice as it is after the event.
    Prevention is better than policing after the event. Free market doesn't work - it's wide open to corruption and bank or other valuations are a classic example of this.

Leave your comment

Guest Sunday, 08 December 2019